Is Corporate Culture and Depersonalized, Bureaucratic Work
Corporate culture refers to the way employees do things around the company, and displays a system of shared beliefs and values that work together with individuals, organizational structures, as well as, systems to produce norms. This implies that corporate culture has a significant effect on employee behavior, perception, and work attitudes. Bureaucracy on the other hand, is comprised of written and inflexible rules, laws, and regulations together the systems of administrations that are distinguished by clear hierarchies of authority. In such instances, corporate culture represents the company’s personality, and therefore, appeals to the irrational, affective and emotional elements within the employees.
Authority and power together with the insidious preoccupation with modern trends of rationalization interested Max Weber; this prompted him to investigate the operations of modern large enterprises in terms of administrative, economic, and political realities. He described bureaucracies as organized in terms of rational principles, such as offices being ranked in hierarchical order and how they operate is characterized according to interpersonal rules (Sullivan, 2009)
Governance of the managers applies methodical allocation of areas, as well as, delimited spheres of duty. Appointment and recruitment are made using the specialized qualifications instead using the written criteria. This type of coordinating actions of a large number of individuals is increasingly becoming the dominant structural feature of the modern forms of organizations. It is through the bureaucracy that large scale planning for the modern economy and modern state has remain to survive, as well as, enabled heads of state to centralize and mobilize resources for political power that have been dispersed in a number of varieties of centers during feudal times (Basu, 2004. )
It therefore, implies that it aids mobilization of economic resource that remained initialized during the pre modern times. Bureaucratic organizations are instrumentally privileged in shaping the modern polity, technology, and the economy, and therefore, this means that bureaucratic organizations are technically advanced to other types of administrations just like machinery production is superior to handmade methods (Sullivan, 2009)
However, there are certain disadvantages of the bureaucracies systems of corporate culture, such as the presence of ambiguities in calculating results. Bureaucracies make it difficult to measure the outcome especially when dealing with personal cases. This makes bureaucratic and modern rationalized systems of law into becoming incapable of dealing with individual personal differences and particularities (Basu, 2004. )
Bureaucratization and rationalization are inescapable of modern methods of organization that have greatly enhanced the efficiency and effectiveness of organization and production, as well as, enabled unprecedented domination of humans over the nature’s world. The capitalist industrial organization according to the sphere of economic production has led to tot eh expropriation where the employee is the means of production, and therefore, the modern industrial worker contrasts with the handicraft artisan, who deals with his own tools and sets his own production and selling limits (Styhre, 2007)
Bureaucratic formal of organizational culture acts both as an expression and as agent of key modern social innovations, which are clearly manifested within the non-inclusive terms through which people are involved in an organization. The way people get involved themselves in organizations epitomizes, as well as, institutionally embeds the critical and most overlooked cultural points of reference of modernity, in which people undertake actions that are tuned towards a delimited and well specified path , however, they have to sacrifice by suspending and isolating their other social and personal considerations. This therefore, implies that organizational involvement of people qua role agents instead of qua person’s aids in unleashing formal organization from being bound to the indolence of the human body, as well as, languish the process of psychological or personal re-orientation (Styhre, 2007)
Bureaucratic organizational cultures have rendered it possible to address some of the shifting contingencies, which underlies the modern life through reassembling and reshuffling the roles and role patterns by which the system is made. This implies that the unique historical adaptive capacity of the bureaucratic systems remains. However, hidden behind the ubiquitous presence of standard and routine procedures are mistakenly exchanged for the quintessence of the bureaucratic form (Manning, 2003)
Bureaucratization is a sociological concept that emphasizes that increased rationalization is inherent in social life, and therefore, cages people into systems that are founded on teleological efficiency, control, and rational calculation. This implies that the modern society is increasingly becoming more characterized by movements in the motivation of individual worker behaviors. It is imperative to argue that social actions are becoming increasingly base on efficiency rather than the older types of social actions that were purely based on kinship or lineage, and therefore, behavior is goal driven instead of relying on tradition and values (Manning, 2003)
Corporate culture comprises the behaviors and beliefs of the people within an organization, and determines how the organization’s employees, as well as, the management handle and interact with outside business deals. The organizational culture of a company organically develops over time emanating from the cumulative traits of the individuals that the organization employs. This could be reflected the employee dress code, hiring decisions, business hours, treatment of clients, client satisfaction, turnover, office setup, employee benefits, as well as, all aspects of the organizations operations (Cremer, 1993)
The main rational reason of examining corporate culture is the relationship between performance and organizational culture, and garners more interest due to the managerial implications related to control, which can easily be communicated, developed, and illustrated using vivid and clear anecdotes.
Corporate culture refers to the unique dominant patterns of shared beliefs, values, assumptions, and the particular norms that shape the path of socialization, language, symbols, and practices of the group of people that constitutes the organization. The approaches and attitudes that typify the way the employees carry out their various tasks and jobs. This therefore, means that culture id developed and transmitted by individuals either consciously or unconsciously to their subsequent generations (McDonald, 2008)
Corporate culture in the classical sense can be referred to as the way of doing things in an organization, and therefore, there are a number of elements that go in helping to determine on what and why to do certain things , and in a certain way. This implies that culture is something that exists and influences how work is done in organizations, which in turn critically affects the overall corporate success or failure, who fits and who does not, as well as, determines the entire mood of the whole organization (Cremer, 1993).
The corporate culture is quite influential during periods of organizational change, such as company mergers where there are possible cultural clashes with the partnering companies. Other notable examples are during growth or any other kind of strategic change, which will imply that the incumbent corporate culture will become inappropriate, and hence would hinder growth and progress rather that promote it (McDonald, Postle & Dawson, 2008).
In static work environments, corporate cultural issues take center stage in being responsible for absenteeism, low morale, or even hog employee turnover, and thus such instances have adverse effects on the organizational productivity. With all the elusiveness, corporate culture has a great influence on the organizational work, as well as, productivity and output. The elusiveness of corporate culture is important for developing approaches and strategies that play a key role when planning organizational change (Styhre, 2007)
One element of corporate culture is the control systems that specifies the ways in which the company is controlled, and therefore, includes control structures in quality systems, financial systems, as well as, reward systems. The control systems therefore specify the procedures and processes that require either weakest or strongest controls or whether the organization is tightly or loosely or controlled. It also specifies how the employees get rewarded or punished for the good or the poor work that they do (McDonald, 2008)
However, the performance and the corporate culture link can be elusive and ambiguous because of the lack of a clear definition of corporate culture. On the other hand corporate culture can be conceptualized in response to observable values and norms that can typically be stressed through quantitative measurement schemes, which in turn helps to examine behavior instead of phenomenological meaning(Basu, 2004)
The corporate culture is definitely a solution to the problems associated with depersonalized bureaucratic work, since it debilitate the negative aspects of the bureaucratic control systems. Most bureaucratic actions are characterized by insincerity, incompetency, and incoherent managerial actions, which end up creating unhappy and unhealthy work environments, which in turn consistently works to destroy the corporate value, as well as, illuminates disrespect towards the worth of the individual employee.
Basu, R. (2004. ). Public administration: Concepts and theorie. New Delhi, India: Sterling Publishers.
Cremer, J. (1993). Corporate culture and shared knowledge. . New York- 3, volume 35, pp. 1-386.: Industrialand Corporate Change,.
Manning, S. (2003). Bureaucracy: Theories and forms with moral implications. Chapter 8 In Ethical leadership in human services: a multi-dimensional approach . Needham Heights: MA: Allyn & Bacon.
McDonald, A. P. (2008). Barriers to retaining and using professionalknowledge in local authority social work practice with adults in the UK. British Journal of Social Work, , 38 (7), 1370-1387.
Styhre, A. (2007). The innovative bureaucracy: Bureaucracy in an age of fluidity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sullivan, M. (2009). Social workers in community care practice: Ideologies and interactionswith older people. . British Journal of Social Work, , 39 (7), 1306-1325.