The writing of Joan Didion is a quest narrative seeking to provide answers to the mystical happenings in Los Angeles. It begins with a transitory description of thenatural acts like the blowing of the wind in an attempt to give audiences an insight into the mystiques of the city. Itproceedswith the transposition of the past to the present in an attempt to describe the unusual events thatdepict the reality in the contemporary society. The composer arranges paragraphsin a manner thatan answer to a question becomes a questionfor the next inquiry. In making the reading interesting, Joan employs the use of the technique together with other rhetoric tacticssuch as the use of first person narration in aiding audiences visualize the reality in Los Angeles. When describing the natural events in the city, the writer shifts to question the occurrencesof the wind before questioning the motive behinds people responses to the natural phenomenon.Joan also uses personal examples and inquisitive terms in justifying her curiosity in understanding the behavior of the inhabitants of disaster prone city. The manner in which the she restructures the sentences by posing a question and providing an answer to the question simultaneously isequally intriguing. It is also intriguing that she exposes the superstition in the behaviors of the residents ofLosAngeles (Didion).Additionally, the composer also employs the use of humor as well as symbolism in the description of a non-quantifiable act such as the pouring of the rain. She also instils fear in the minds of the reader thus accomplishing the goal of making the piece a form of melodrama.
In addition to using her imagination in questioning and describingtheoccurrences in Los Angeles, the author refers to the questioning of other composersin validating the explanation. As a result, the reading comes out as an interesting piece that informs people about the unusual realities of the city of LosAngeles. From the analysis, one gets an insight into developments that characterized the cities of United States. Theuse of flashbacks serves as an insight into the likely events that will take place in LosAngeles in thefuture. The use of technique together with rhetoric questioning works best since the approachmakes the piece realistic as well as insightful. In addition to facilitating the utilization obvious methods of composition, the unique approach encourages imaginative thinking beside enlightening audiences.Another technique that works best in the validation of the explanation of the events taking place in the city is the use monolog and similes. Together with rhetoric, the techniques serves their purpose since the audiences learn about the challenges of the character from an objective perspective.
In answering the question,“Who Am I, or Who Was I”,one has to employ the use of rhetoric in guiding people envisage the circumstances surrounding the life of an individual from diverse perspectives.Afterward, the narrator has to reflect the past in questioning the futurebefore preempting the future using the present. An example in cases is narrating one’spast as a child before proceeding to question whether the past influencedthe present in the narration. A case in point is using a question like, “Who wasI really, and are you interested in knowing my past, then if so you should forget it in order to live in the present.While answering the question, it is important describing the present challenges using real life examples sincethe description influences the perception of readers.In order augment humor and create more drama, communicating in a manner that suggest one does not understand himself is also important when answering the question. In my case, I will answer the question “who I am”, by using the past as a way of telling the audiences about the things that will happen in the future.
Coming up with a narration asking a question, “Is it necessary knowing who am I’ is also helpful in making the reading worthwhile. This is because without the questioning, readers will lack an insight into the mind of the writers. Consequently, the technique exposes the imperfections in the life of an individual since one cannot master everything in life. However, in order to make the reading interesting, it is necessary using personal examples that could easily arouse people’s emotions. Just like in a fictitious composition, authors use rhetoric in the explanation becausethe past has a way of manifesting in future in the lives of characters. Therefore, when using literary techniques in describing the fictitious past, the question, Who Am I, or Who Was I, is necessary moving back and forth in answering the question for discussion. Subsequently, effectiveness in the use of therhetorical technique is mandatory since the approach makesreadingsrealistic.
When seeking to accomplish one objective in life such as finding meaning inlife, there exists the possibility of the pursuit leading to frustration in the event that one fails to do so. Therefore, when answering, who I was, it is necessary generalizing description before opting to provide personal information about oneself. By readingthe manner in which thenarrator structures the questions and responses, one learn about who we are.Similar to the reading, theHow do I know I’m in love?Chiarellaemployed the use of rhetoric in describing the unfolding events in the lives of the characters in the play. His selection of the theme of love in the novel served as an indicator thatmany are unaware that an individual’s upbringinginfluence the attitude of an individual.The manner in which the answer appears as questions in different context also intrigues readers, thus facilitating the accomplishment of the objective of telling people about the narrator.
Didion, Joan. Los Angeles notebook.