Family and Consumer Science

0 Comments

 

Introduction

Joshua and Leonardo, a young couple are blessed with a daughter, Christa. The arrival of Christa becomes a genesis of conflicts as the couple disagrees on how to attend to their young daughter. Practical reasoning is one of the routines that Joshua and Leonardo can employ in order to resolve their conflict. It constitutes the critical thinking process in choosing what to believe and do in situations that influence people (Parker, Christopherson, Gebhardt & Thomas, 2009). It integrates scientific reasoning and employs clear evidence when weighing choices, values and consequences.

The first step that the two should undertake to solve their problem is to accept their differences and talk about them (Parker et al, 2009). Joshua and Leonardo uphold different opinion concerning their problem. Joshua suggests that Leonardo should check in and watch over Christa while Leonardo strongly argues that she needs to resume to her career duties lest she loses her achievements and benefits. This process of problem-solving constitutes analysis of related factors, valued ends, unconventional actions and the consequences incurred. After accepting their differences, they should then move to communicate about them (Parker et al, 2009). Communication is vital in this case to help their marriage work. Accepting to talk calmly about the problem at hand without passing the blame to each other will help them come up with a viable solution. This approach should involve responding to a number of questions:

  1. What types of values are subjected to this situation?
  2. What would the community suggest?
  3. What are views of Leonardo and Joshua and how do they contradict?
  4. What actions should be employed to settle the conflict between Joshua and Leonardo?
  5. What are the short-term and long-term consequences of these actions?

A clear and unbiased response to the above questions will result into a possible solution in the conflict between Joshua and Leonardo. Leonardo is fighting for her right and as a woman she wants to respond to her personal goals. Joshua should listen to his wife and relate his arguments to the universally accepted values in the society. He should also avoid seeing Leonardo as a stay-at-home mother and perceive her as a person with her own personal interests and goals. On the other hand, Leonardo should listen to Joshua and in a clear way explain her rationale to him.

Another routine to enable Joshua and Leonardo solve the problem at hand involves developing a working plan. The two need to sit down and develop a plan of actions that they will all agree on to end the tension and conflict between them (Parker et al, 2009). For example they can both agree on finding a good baby-sitter to watch over their child. Also, they can decide to work during different shifts so that they take turns in taking care of the child. Developing a good plan can help reduce stress and give them a common ground and goals to work towards.

Lastly, they can resolve to seek for help from the people around them or even from professionals. There are times when it is difficult for a family to solve their relationship problems independently and, therefore, they may need external help (Jackson, 2002). Joshua and Leonardo can seek another family member that they trust to help them mediate through their conflict. They can also seek professional help from relationship or family counselors. A mediator or a relationship counselor will listen to their problem and help them reach a decision that will work for both of them.

People in loving and supportive relationships can help one another emotionally and practically. Supportive partners should assist each other during tough times. The above possibilities should be weighed to analyze the consequences of each decision outlined. The best action is then chosen and implemented; Leonardo and Joshua should possibly find and employ a baby sitter to watch over their daughter.

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

UK BEST WRITING