Hotel Rwanda Critique

0 Comments

he dreadful evidence of evil, corruption, and perversity of the human heart is not only in memory, one encounter with the present knowledge. This shows that arguments on evil are not only still suitable for the matters emerging in a future world, but are perhaps more suitable than ever before. The film is Relevant in the discussion of evil and hatred in the society because the events that occurred during the genocide can only fall into the evil category of deeds. Even though, the movie shows acts of evil, there is the aspect of love through helping others despite individual differences.

The movie also shows love for one another and the importance of it. This is, especially, through the actions of Don Cheadle who plays Rusesabagina. As the political instability in the homeland worsens, Rusesabagina and his family observe friends dying in tribal aggression. He finds favor with people bribing them with money and alcoholic beverage, searching to keep the family safe. Ones the civil war starts and an Army agent threaten Rusesabagina and his friends; he barely negotiates for their security, but instead brings every person to the hotel. More refugees come to the hotel from the overcrowded camps, the Red Cross, and orphanages. Rusesabagina must redirect the Hutu soldiers, look after the refugees, be a source of power to his family, and sustain the look of a functioning comfortable hotel as the position becomes more violent (George, et al, 2005). Rusesabagina uses the words “finds favor with people” to show that he loved and opted to help other people. The words emphasize the fact that he had a choice not to help, but chose to help despite the threats from the army.

After the Second World War, the Nazis started the genocide. People hoped a repeat of the same would never occur, but events in Rwanda proved different. The events that unfolded in 1994 in Rwanda demonstrate the potential for actions of evil. In fact, many people failed to believe that this was indeed genocide. In the war, Dallaire played a crucial role. Most of his work was to defend areas he knew Tutsis were hiding. When others failed to organize the peace mission, he was able to put up team of UN observers after the Belgium who he earlier considered the best trained left Rwanda. Dallaire forms a team that together with the UN peacekeeping forces brings peace to Rwanda. This is because many did not believe that it was a repeat of genocide and, as a result, did not come in to help (George, et al, 2005). Rusesabagina uses the word “Nazi” to describe the actions that took place in Rwanda. People associate The Nazi with evil and war, and as such, the word best describes the situation in Rwanda at that time. The word also emphasizes that the conflict in Rwanda was genocide and not just any other ordinary misunderstanding of people.

Personal identification causes a divide among individuals even though they are alike. The issues of personal identification and legitimization are also vital to comprehending how the Hutus felt justified in brutally murdering their previous associates and friends. The two ethnic groups speak the same language, live in the same area, and follow the same customs. In other words, there was no tribal violence until the Hutu made Tutsis use the divisions. Rusesabagina proceeds to state that Outsiders produce off springs where indigenous people live and how they differ from others who are not theirs. This means that to legitimize their own identity groups should identify a group of foreigners with whom they can misidentify (George, et al, 2005). Rusesabagina uses the word “identification” to show that the main reason for the genocide was the group identification. This is because though the Rwandans were similar to the Belgians who had divided them into two categories, which is the main cause of the division that led to the genocide.

In conclusion, one may argue that the soldier’s activities reveal his principles. While it would have been unrealistic for them not to consider the results of their activity, one can conclude that their actions to support the regulation outdid their need to help the refugees. Through Don Cheadle, actions of helping those who were not from his side, despite knowing the risks he faced, one learns the importance of love for others. This is clear when he chooses to invite people to the hotel and has to divert the attention of the Hutu Soldiers.

 

Reference

George, T., Cheadle, P., Okonedo, S., Phoenix, J., Dube, P., O’ Hara, D., Guerra, A., & Afro Celt Sound System (Musical group), et al. (2005). Hotel Rwanda. United States: Metro Goldwyn Mayer Home Entertainment.

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

UK BEST WRITING