Psychology Bias in the Workplace

From women in the workplace by McKinsey&Company from their survey finds that women in many organizations remain underrepresented all over that organization, majorly at the higher levels of leadership where most men prevail. From the study, they find that from entry level all the way to the C-suite, women are understated in most of the United States corporations. The survey discovers that women are less likely to advance as compared to their counterparts-men and they usually face restrictions in senior leadership. To be particular, this study indicates that, considering the rate of progression in the last three years, over 100 years will be taken for the upper reaches of the most of United States corporations to achieve gender equality (McKinsey&Company, 2015).

McKinsey & Company conducted findings with an aim to encourage gender parity and female leadership in most of the workplace. Regarding this, 118 companies and an approximate of around 30,000 workers participated in this study which builds on a comparable effort that McKinsey conducted in 2012. From the study, it was revealed that regardless of diffident improvements, there was similar predominant in the findings, that is, women remains to be the most underrepresented in each and every level in many of the corporations(McKinsey&Company, 2015). Most of the disparities were noted at the senior levels of leadership.

Women in the Workplace by McKinsey&Company concluded that for several reasons, women are less likely than their counterparts-men to advance. This could be accredited to reasons such that; most women experience undistributed playing field with most of them dominating lower at every level; leadership gap is persistent in most of the senior roles; most corporations widely believes that gender diversity is not a priority. Although there have been several employee programs which aim at helping in balancing work and family, participation was low among both genders. This was a result of concerns that making use of them will damagingly affect their careers.

Summarization of Dual Path Way to a Better America

Dual path way to a better America indicates that typecast prejudices, as well as discrimination, have apparent results for their direct targets. Moreover, they also have an effect on the families and communities who support and interact with them. The report has gone further to document various processes and mechanisms related to psychology which worsens the effects. The research from this report has gone further to give suggestion on some strategies which can alleviate the negative effects. Most of these strategies follow centers on educational outreach. Education in this research is viewed to be the main gateway to change in attitude (American Psychology Association, 2012).

The research encourages APA (American Psychological Association) to endorse and takes advantage of newer forms of media such as blogs and web-based videos which disseminate education materials, aiming lay population as well as professional in the field and American Psychology Association. Dual path way to a better America report addresses that APA should be principle leader in endorsing knowledge related to psychology as well as methods to enable resolution of personal, societal, and international challenges related to multicultural and worldwide contexts.

This report is relevant to two strategic plan goals. These goals are; giving emphasizes the central role of American Psychology Association in positioning psychology as the science of behavior. This will be aimed to increase public awareness of the benefits that psychology usually bring to the living of many people. The other strategic plan goal is intensifying role of psychology in progressing health promotes the role of psychology in lessening health differences.















  1. American Psychology Association (2012). Dual pathways to a better America.
  2. McKinsey&Company. (2015). Women in the Workplace.






buy custom essay