Assignment 1: Discussion—Article Analysis
In this discussion assignment, you will be analyzing an article to evaluate how effectively the author has managed to convey his or her point of view.
Read the following article from the Argosy University online library:
· Swartz, J. (2010, October 19). Privacy breached in Facebook apps. USA Today, p. 2b.
ARTICLE POSTED BELOW*************
Then, based on your analysis of the article, respond to the following:
· What is the genre of this article: news, editorial (an opinion piece), or public relations?
· What is the purpose of the writer? Justify your answer with evidence from the textbook. Consider answering these questions: Are there any unfavorable impressions provided, or does the author remain neutral? What language suggests this to you?
· Who is the intended audience (who would be likely to read and agree with the ideas)? How does this relate to the genre? Justify your answers with evidence from the textbook.
· What evidence (voices and statistics) does the writer include? How does the evidence influence the purpose?
Write your initial response in about 150–200 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
SAN FRANCISCO — A potentially serious security breach affecting tens of millions of Facebook users is the latest privacy snafu dogging the world’s largest online social network.
The 10 most-popular Facebook applications — including Zynga’s popular social game FarmVille, which reaches 56 million people — have been transmitting users’ personal identifying information to dozens of advertising and Internet tracking companies, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
In a statement, Facebook called the report “exaggerated” and said there is “no evidence that any personal information was misused or even collected.”
It’s also exploring technical solutions and expects to disclose details in the next few days.
Zynga did not respond to a request for comment.
At issue are user IDs, the unique identifier assigned to each Facebook member. Those IDs could be included in the “referers” that websites send to other sites to tell them where the user originated, the Journal reported.
Privacy advocates and legal experts say the issue is more a design flaw on the Internet than a nefarious bid by Facebook to monetize user data. Still, the imbroglio may fan some users’ lingering doubts about the safety of their data on Facebook.
If members don’t trust Facebook with their data, they aren’t likely to use the site as much, says Alan Chapell, an attorney who specializes in privacy law.
“It’s not intentional (on Facebook’s part), but the leakage of data undermines its trust with some users,” says Justin Brookman, senior fellow at the Center for Democracy & Technology.
Chester Wisniewski, senior security adviser at Sophos, suggests Facebook invoke a more stringent validation process for third-party applications, as Apple does.
ACLU attorney Chris Conley says Facebook needs to provide privacy settings that let members control which apps have access to their personal info.