A woman in a society is subjected to a number of limitations. Gender injustices denies women chance to participate in roles such as leadership. Women suffrage is an example of a restriction in which they lack the freedom to take part in active voting. This limitation fails to permit women an opportunity to indulge in active office roles. A clear affirmation to this statement is founded by the fact that different views emerges on the same. This essay analyses the comments of Professor Kuhlman and Professor Woodworth-Ney towards women suffrage.
Professor Kuhlman suggests that women suffrage started from individual nations all over the world. She categorically states that women appears in the second class due to male dominance on political issues. On the other hand, Professor Woodworth-Ney bases her arguments on Western America, United States in particular. According to her, passion to deny women fair justice is because of male agitation on the political frontlines. From the two professor’s arguments, it fair to generalize that women suffrage is as a result of male authority on political matters.
Conversely, suffrage movement is never successful because of certain reasons. For instance, men are not supporting such movements. On the other hand, analysts argues to justify political unfairness while tackling the issue. Woodworth-Ney claims of a belief that supports women suffrage on the basis that it tolerates black votes.
In an attempt to grant women suffrage, different concern issues started emerging. First, most of the domestic gender issues were politicized. This topic motivated women to act as political rebels in the society. Secondly, it also depreciated some of the key roles women undertakes in the society. Professor Kuhlman takes a case study of Germany where women were restricted to undertake motherly roles. Illiteracy levels among women encourage women’s suffrage since such minds may not participate in rational voting for significant change.
In sum, analysis in this document matched with Foner’s text offers a conclusive judgment. Offering women a chance to participate in active voting is a natural process. As generation changes, different provisions prevails in this society. This is the reason behind a scale of differences one can record while comparing women from different generations.